Sunday, November 30, 2014

CLIMATE



Climate Change Can Affect Security Environment, Hagel Says

http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=123393

Banusiewicz, John D. "United States Department of Defense." Defense.gov News Article: Climate Change Can Affect Security Environment, Hagel Says. Defense Media Activity, 12 Oct. 2014. Web. 01 Dec. 2014. <http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=123393>.

  • What portion or portions of this information do you accept as sound science? What portion or portions, if any, do you question? Give three reasons you question it or them.
The article I choose to read is based on the environment and climate change and how the weather can affect security of our country. I think that Hagel, the Defense secretary makes very valid points in regards to our security being at risk if the sea levels rise. I do feel that he is correct in his theory that if sea levels rise we do have more of a threat of security due to use competing to take the resources ourselves, fighting against other nations who too would want control of them. I do feel that this is not necessarily sound science because although he makes a very good theory, there are no reports that he makes reference to that the sea levels are truly rising and he has no idea of the time frame this may happen in. I feel like it would be much stronger theory if there was some evidence linked to the idea that how security is at risk.

  • What can you do (given the time and energy) to find answers to your questions?  If you do not question any portion or portions, give three reasons you accept the information. Is it peer-reviewed, etc.
The best thing that  I can do to answer my questions is to research more about the Arctic sea levels and what the history has been in regards to ice melting and sea levels rising. I could also research to see if there were any other situations that are similar to this one either proving or disproving the idea that a nations security is at risk due to new evolving resources. I could also try to figure who would be the biggest threat to our security and see if there was any way to come up with a partnership to deflect any upsets nations who too would benefit from the natural resources that could possibly be created from the sea levels rising. I could also get a team of my own scientists and go to the Arctic to measure the actual level of ice that is currently there and compare it to the ice in the past. I would also research what resources that are in the area and what nations would benefit from them most.

  • Answer this question: Does having a background in Environmental Biology help you make decisions about what information about the environment you will accept? Explain.
I think having a background in Environmental biology helps me make more of an educated decision on what I feel is accurate and not accurate because it makes you question every theory or idea that is presented and makes you want to do your own research to make sure that its truly accurate.

Sunday, November 9, 2014

Elwha River


  
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b9/Elwha_river_dams.gif 

 
https://bethechange2012.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/elwhariver.png

October 2014: Elwha River
The Elwha River is a 45-mile river on the Olympic Peninsula in Washington State. The rivers main source of water comes from Elwha Snowfinger near Mount Barnes which is a mountain range in Olympic National Park, in Jefferson County. The river flows southeast and the turns northward for the rest of its course.
Reasons for Building Elwha Dam
Thomas Aldwell, an entrepreneur saw the river as an economic opportunity; the river and its narrow gorges. He simply wanted to capture this raw, massive energy. This is how the idea of a hydroelectric dam came into play. Aldwell had financial backing from Chicago Investors, who created the Olympic Power Company. After plans were created construction of the dam began in 1910 and took three years to construct before it was creating energy. In 1913 the dam was the source of power for the pulp mill in Port Angeles.
Reasons for Removing Elwha Dam
The Elwha dam presented many problems for the surrounding area. Things like sediment and silt blockage behind the dam, erosion of the river banks and effects on a large portion of the park and the people who once relied on the fish populations for sustenance. Elwha river was known for some of richest runs of salmon outside of Alaska. Because Aldwell cut corners on the dam there was a lack of passage ways for migrating salmon. The salmon that once numbered more than 400,000 fish returns in over 70 miles of available habitat is now less than 4,000 fish on only 4.9 miles. The removal of the dam is the only viable option for full restoration of the river and the habitat.
 Ecology
Two special animals of the Elwha River are the Sockeye Salmon and the Bull Trout. The Sockeye Salmon are currently thought to be extinct in the Elwha.
Current Use
Today both dams are gone and the Lake Mills and Lake Aldwell reservoirs have drained. The river flows freely now. The sediment that was once trapped behind the dams is now rebuilding critical river and near shore habitats.
Current Threats
Through my research I could not find any current threat in regards to the Elwha River. Most of the threats were caused when the dam was in place.

Friday, October 31, 2014

Biotic Community: Lower Colorado River: Sonoran Desert



The name of my biotic community is the Lower Colorado River Subdivision of the Sonoran Desert. It is located specifically downtown Phoenix area but covers a much wider area all together. This community is dominated by low shrubs, primarily creosote bush (L. tridentate) and white bursage (Ambrosia dumosa).  These shrubs don’t require much water to survive but are most common by drainage ways. These plants can live up to two years without water at all. The plants have very shallow roots to intercept any water that falls on the soil. 


Friday, October 17, 2014

Wildlife Corridor Lab




 Proposed Wildlife Corridors over Interstate 40 in Coconino County.

Step 1: The area I choose to design my wildlife corridor is located in Northern AZ in Coconino County. The two habitats that my corridor will be reconnecting is the northern and southern part of Coconino County that is divided by Interstate 40.  Interstate 40 divides the southern area of Coconino County and runs directly through flagstaff causing habitat fragmentation. The spatial area of Coconino County consists of 1.8 million acres and is part of the United States National Forest. The temporal idea of Coconino County was originally established as the “San Francisco Mountains National Reserve”  was later designated a U.S. National forest in 1908 when the reserve merged with land from surrounding forests creating what we know as Coconino County. Coconino County has a diversity of abiotic features like: deserts, ponderosa pine forests, mesas, flatlands, alpine tundra, and ancient volcanic peaks. The edge effect of Interstate 40 is putting many wildlife animals life at risk due to heavy traffic patterns as this one of two Interstates in Arizona, the other being Interstate 10. The topography and elevation ranges anywhere from 2,600 feet to 12,633 feet; the lowest point being the Verde River and the highest point of Humphreys Peak, both which are natural features in that county but one amazing natural feature in that county is Mormon Lake; the largest natural lake in the state of Arizona. Two human imposed features of Coconino County are Lowell Observatory located near Anderson Mesa and at the base of Anderson Mesa are two man made reservoirs that are known as Upper Lake Mary and Lower Lake Mary.

Step 2: Although Coconino County is the home to over a dozen species. The one I choose for my wildlife corridor is Elk or Cervus canadensis, which is largest member of the deer family and one of the largest mammals in North America.  Elk there can weigh up to 1,200 pounds. But normally range anywhere from 600 to 800 lbs.

Step 3: The core habitat of Elk inhabit the forested areas of Coconino County at higher altitudes where there is a good water source that is nearby. They prefer to be at higher elevations anywhere from 7,000 feet to 10,000 feet during the summer months. During the winter however they migrate to lower elevations of Coconino County because the snow forces then to seek lower ground.  Because of Interstate 40 it causes geographic isolation for elk and other wildlife that migrate south during the winter months. Current condition of Interstate 40 is a death zone for elk and people who travel on this roadway. There are many accidents due to Elk crossings and can be fatal for both the travelers and the elk. The corridor would be designed not only for the safety and protection of the species but also the protection of the traveler due to the fact that hitting an elk can cause a fatal accident and does so each year often. Possible future conditions that we face are the increase of population in the flagstaff and surrounding areas and those that travel on Interstate 40. With increased travel there is a higher percentage of accidents due to elk crossing. The corridors along Interstate 40 would lower the chances of accidents and deaths of both travelers and elk.

Step 4: The Corridors would be constructed over designated areas of Interstate 40 in populated areas that elk migrate. Engineers and researchers would practice adaptive management prior to construction. The elks would then be tagged with a GPS monitoring tag that can be tracked on a map that shows frequent areas that they migrate or travel often. The Corridors would be varied widths according to how much each path is travelled and how many elk use that path. The lower number of elks that use any specific path would narrow the corridor. The corridors would range anywhere the width of a two lane road, about 30ft wide, to the middle range width of a six lane highway which can be 90ft wide, to the largest corridor that would be nearly 200ft wide. This is all based of tracking the most used paths of travel. The goal is to make the species comfortable to cross over the corridor without being disturbed by oncoming traffic. The Corridors would be built directly over the Interstate and would allow the elk to travel over the traffic. The corridor would be constructed like any over pass would be except the landscape (dirt, rocks, and plants) would be used in place for the surface covering. There would also be higher edged walls about 6ft -10ft tall to prevent animals from jumping onto the interstate below. The larger corridors would have dim lighting on the underside of it for safety as cars travel through the underpass without causing light pollution in their natural environment.  There would also be a fence that leads up to the entrance/exit of each side of the corridor to lead the animal to the corridor itself and would be connected to existing fences that travel along Interstate 40. The corridors would be maintained if and serviced often to make sure that dirt and vegetation is still present after large storms where any water may wash out dirt and plants. Along the roadside there would be signs installed that warns the driver of any elk crossing and the corridor itself. The speed itself would not be changed due to the fact that many freight trucks travel on this interstate; which would potentially irritate them having to slow down and then try to regain speed, especially at higher elevations.

Step 5: These proposed corridors would allow for geographic isolation and safe travel for the elk population as they migrate to and from the northern and southern regions, in addition to preventing the impediments of a potential decreasing population, promoting population or maintain current population. Maintaining the current population would increase the birth rate of these species by decreasing the loss of elk to which can reproduce, but would have no effect on inbreeding of the species. The mitigation of the corridors would be in the effort to keep the species safer for the species and travelers on Interstate 40 lowering the risk of fatal accidents and death the species. The corridors will accommodate the elk in many ways but the two that would be the most important is that due to the travel patterns researched that the elk travel, the path will seem familiar to them and make it a comfortable area to travel across and because of the wide areas of more traveled areas, the elk would not be too cramped while migrating together.

Step 6: Map of Corridor. The corridors will be designed to match the area it is built. Construction of the corridor will be mostly made from steel and concrete. 



Citation
Design Corridor Render. Digital image. No Title. N.p., n.d. 17 Oct. 2014 Web. <https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5fz0ZmhSyMVavU6e472fKYUyG2MQB_PKvNSIaR2fhD0bVuh3U3N1AljISSm-GVy_7tyUhhiOIqI6yN7F1h5cqhSvLGStKvXmyaj3HxE8ewEZwNDUFO4Vsoy7Ej_tpQckwnz1McW9SX95w/s1600/wildlife+corridor+1.png>.
Digital image. Elk Photo. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Oct. 2014. <http://www.vallescaldera.gov/comevisit/elk/images/elk_running.jpg>.

Projecting Bacterial Growth



  1. Approximately when was the bottle half full? 12pm
  2.  How much closer? 11:59
  3. If you were one of the bacteria, when do you suppose you’d start to worry about overcrowding? Approximately at a quarter to halfway full.
  4. Would that leave you enough time to do anything about it? Not if it continued to grow exponentially it wouldn’t.
  5. Did anything surprise you about these two parts? If so, what? I was surprised at how fast the bacteria grew. I initially guessed the time wrong because I didn’t expect it to grow so quickly.
  6. Why do you think people might have trouble or resistance to understanding exponential growth? I think because in the beginning the growth difference doesn’t seem like it multiplies so quickly. Then all of the sudden it starts and it grows “exponentially” !
  7. Whenever you hear that something is growing by some percentage, or that something is growing steadily, what rule should you remember in order to understand the rate of growth? Explain this rule. The rule of 70. 70 divided by the percentage of growth gives the amount of time it would take for the amount to double.
  8. “When our consumption of a resource (energy, for instance) grows steadily, the doubling time takes on an even scarier meaning.” What is that scarier meaning? We use up more of the resources than we ever have before.
  9. “…if we keep increasing our energy consumption like this, we’ll use more energy in the next 25 years than we’ve produced in all of history up till now.”
  10. “There are those who say we don’t need to worry about running out of oil, because there’s still lots of oil left in the ground. Experts believe that over the past 150 years we have used up about half the total oil on Earth. In other words, our oil supply “bottle” is still half full.” But if we keep doubling our population, what will happen? We will use up all of the oil and there will not be any let.